The federal government has amended the Food and Drug Regulations (FDR)1 and the Safe Food for Canadians Regulations (SFCR)2 to update the requirements for labelling prepackaged food products (Modernized Food Labelling Framework). Health Canada has also amended the FDR3 to introduce a new requirement for front-of-package nutrition symbol labelling (FOP Labelling) for select prepackaged products containing nutrients of public health concern (saturated fat, sugars and sodium), and to update the requirements for certain nutrient content claims.
Prescribed standard container sizes for a number of prepackaged food products (e.g., certain fresh fruits and vegetables) have been repealed from the SFCR, and the remaining list of sizes has been incorporated by reference in the standard container sizes document.
The list of mandatory and optional common names (which the FDR previously required or permitted for identifying certain foods and classes of foods, e.g., “vegetable oil” and “seasonings”) was repealed from the FDR and incorporated by reference in the common names for ingredients and components document. Consequential amendments were also made to the Cannabis Regulations4 to reflect these amendments. These amendments were made in response to consumer and industry concerns regarding the clarity and flexibility of common names, and to increase regulatory alignment with major trading partners to expand market access5.
A definition for “test market food” was added to the SFCR to clarify the intent of a Test Market Authorization (TMA), by limiting the application of TMAs to foods that were not previously sold in Canada in the current form and that differ substantially from any other food sold in Canada with respect to composition, function, condition or packaging form. The amendment is intended to limit food businesses from seeking TMAs as a means to obtain exemptions from regulatory requirements for food products, such as standard container sizes6. Existing TMAs will continue to apply until their expiry date.
Several food commodity-specific labelling requirements were streamlined by either repealing the commodity-specific labelling requirement or introducing a single requirement that applies to all prepackaged food products. For example, several previously existing labelling requirements were replaced by a new provision in the FDR that requires the packaging of certain foods to include words that distinguish them from other similar foods (e.g., distinguishing tuna packed “in brine” from tuna packed “in oil”).
Additionally, certain food descriptors in the SFCR (such as “soft”, “semi-soft”, “firm”, and “ripened” for cheese) are now incorporated by reference in the descriptive words, expressions and identification names document instead of in the SFCR itself. Other food commodity-specific labelling requirements were not affected by the amendments (e.g., those required for health and safety reasons, to protect consumers from false and misleading information, or for trade reasons).
Amendments to the SFCR were made to clarify that restaurants and other similar enterprises with cross-provincial border operations are not subject to the SFCR licensing requirements.
Amendments to the FDR and SFCR came into force on June 21, 2022. There is no transition period for implementation of these amendments, with the exception that foods that are currently being sold under a TMA may continue to be sold until the expiry of the TMA.
The new FOP Labelling requires that a nutrition symbol be displayed on the front of packaging of a prepackaged food product that contains or exceeds a certain threshold of saturated fat, sugars or sodium. The amendments to the FDR have introduced prescribed requirements for the placement and format of the FOP Labelling. One example of such a format is set out below.
Parallel to the amendments to the FDR, Health Canada published a guide on front-of-package nutrition symbol labelling7 that is intended to assist stakeholders in the food industry understand the core requirements of the FOP Labelling.
Certain foods or types of foods are exempted or prohibited from the FOP Labelling requirement. The amendments to the FDR also introduced restrictions on nutrient content and health-related claims when the label of a prepackaged food product contains FOP Labelling. For example, an “unsweetened” claim is prohibited on the principal display panel of a prepackaged food product when a product contains FOP Labelling for “high in sugars”. Additionally, it is prohibited to use representations on packaging that are likely to be mistaken for FOP Labelling, or to advertise or sell such products.
The table of nutrient content claims (which prescribed nutrient content claims such as “low in sodium” and “no added sugar” and provided the conditions for use of such claims) was repealed. In its place, nutrient content claim requirements were incorporated by reference via a new table of permitted nutrient content statements and claims, to permit these claims to be more easily updated in response to new evidence and related nutrition labelling policies8. In parallel, Health Canada published a notice of modification outlining changes to the conditions for certain nutrient content claims and the introduction of a new “low in sugars” nutrient content claim9.
The FDR were also further amended to permit representations regarding alcoholic content for beverages with less than 0.5% alcohol and to update references to food “intended solely for children under two years of age” to reflect new age categories.
Other changes introduced by the amendments to the FDR include the following:
The FOP Labelling requirements, updates to nutrient content claims and other changes for prepackaged foods discussed above came into force on July 20, 2022. However, manufacturers will have a transition period ending December 31, 2025 to comply with new requirements. Products imported, manufactured in Canada or packaged at retail before this transition period ends can remain in the warehouse and continue to be sold in stores11.
This bulletin was written with assistance from Luke Jeagal and Nushrah Amod.
To discuss these issues, please contact the author(s).
This publication is a general discussion of certain legal and related developments and should not be relied upon as legal advice. If you require legal advice, we would be pleased to discuss the issues in this publication with you, in the context of your particular circumstances.
For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Janelle Weed.
© 2024 by Torys LLP.
All rights reserved.